Verification responsibility
Agree who verifies what on site, and in what form the information reaches us.
As-built means what was installed, not what was designed — and a record model is only as trustworthy as the verification behind it.
Additional building BIM services
A record model that is the design model with a new title block is a liability dressed as a handover deliverable. We update against verified site information and state clearly what has been verified and what has not, because an operator who trusts an unverified record model will find out the hard way.
Refurbishment and fit-out projects inherit services nobody has drawn accurately for years. Modelling them from old drawings without checking produces a confident model of the wrong building. We agree the verification responsibility first — survey, scan or marked-up site information — and model to it.
An owner needs to find the equipment, know what it is and know what was left open. Asset registers, a file index and a handover note listing assumptions and limitations are what make a model usable after the project team has gone.
Deliverables
Any of these can be appointed on their own or combined. Nothing here depends on buying the intelligence layer, which is not for sale in any case.
Catalogue scope
The full list from the BIMRACE service catalogue. Each item can be included or excluded in a proposal; the code is the one used in our scope documents.
How it runs
Sequence is not a formality on this kind of work. Most of the expensive rework we are asked to fix was produced by doing step four before step two.
Agree who verifies what on site, and in what form the information reaches us.
Collect the design model, mark-ups, survey or scan data and site records.
Update or build the model against verified information only.
Record verification status element by element.
Populate equipment and asset registers to the agreed schema.
Model, drawings, registers and a handover note with assumptions and limitations.
What we need to start
Missing any of these is survivable. Not knowing which of them are missing is not, so we establish it at enquiry stage rather than at forty per cent.
AI & automation
AI is used throughout our delivery workflow, and an engineer reviews every output. Every line carries its real status.
Scope boundary
Published because a scope boundary discovered at month three is a dispute, and the same boundary stated at enquiry stage is just information.
Request a quote
Tell us the building, the stage and what you need. An engineer replies within two working days with approach, deliverables and a fee basis.
Quote request received
Have drawings ready? Use the full enquiry form to attach them.
What a useful quote needs. Building type and approximate area, the disciplines, the project stage, and which drawings or models exist. If you have them ready, the full enquiry form takes file uploads.
NDAs. We sign before drawings or models are shared, as a matter of course.
FAQ
Site verification responsibility is defined per project. We model from the verified information supplied, and scan-based modelling is available as a specialist scope.
Stated verification status, element by element. A record model that does not distinguish between what was verified on site and what was carried over from design invites trust it has not earned.
Yes — existing-condition models and services documentation, from the drawings and site information available, with the accuracy each source supports stated.
Related
Engineering enquiry
Send a scope, a drawing set or the workflow you want this applied to. You will get a technical response on approach, disciplines, deliverables and what is realistically automatable — from an engineer, not a sales desk.